Major keeps referendum options open
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.John Major yesterday made it clear that he was not planning a referendum on Britain's future in the European Union in advance of the 1996 Inter-Governmental Conference on Europe - while continuing to keep open the prospect of holding one in the l onger term.
His latest remarks on the issue still consuming Tory backbenchers came after Sir Edward Heath, the former Prime Minister, delivered a scathing warning to him that if he had warmed to a referendum in order to appease Euro-rebel MPs his move "would fail completely and is therefore mistaken''.
It came amid some signs of disarray within Labour's ranks in the House of Lords after Lord Peston, a front-bench trade and industry spokesman, stated that "some of us'' regard a single currency as "absolutely essential to the future of the [EU]''.
The Prime Minister's coolness on the idea of a pre-IGC referendum, which was not unexpected, came in response to a carefully worded question from the pro-European ex-minister Tim Yeo, who backed the general idea of a referendum by saying that "the results of last four general elections show that the good sense of the British people can normally be relied on''.
Mr Yeo suggested that if the IGC was to produce "substantial changes in the EU, that the use of referendum might then be justified''. But it was "extremely difficult in advance of the IGC to know precisely what the question might be in a referendum''.
In what was read by some MPs as an attempt to contain speculation on a referendum, Mr Major replied that while he was "not prepared to close the door'' to one there were "very important constitional matters to be considered and it would be very unwise atto how to deal with that matter''.
Earlier, Sir Edward told BBC Radio 4' Today programme that one reason why the public had warmed to the idea of a referendum was that it "lost confidence in Parliament and the Government''.
There was mild irritation among the Labour leadership that Lord Peston had chosen to make such a strong statement in favour of a single currency, though it was emphasised on behalf of Tony Blair, the party leader, that Labour policy was to favour the principle of a single currency but that it had to be preceded by financial and economic convergence by the countries taking part.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments