Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lords may ambush plans to limit benefits

Nigel Morris,Deputy Political Editor
Sunday 03 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments
(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Plans to impose an annual limit on benefit payments could be ambushed in the House of Lords following a warning from within Whitehall that the move risked making 40,000 families homeless.

A leaked letter from the private office of the Communities Secretary, Eric Pickles, raised the alarm over the unforeseen effects of proposals to cap total household benefits at £500 a week, or £26,000 a year.

The scheme was announced by Chancellor George Osborne at last year's Conservative Party conference. But to the embarrassment of Mr Pickles, a candidly worded letter about the scheme from his private secretary, Nico Heslop, to his opposite number at Downing Street was leaked yesterday to The Observer.

It warned that the estimated £270m annual savings from the plan could be wiped out by the cost to councils of rehousing families who can no longer afford to pay for their accommodation. Far from contributing towards the Government's deficit-reduction programme, the scheme could end up generating a "net cost" to the Exchequer.

It also said that welfare cuts would jeopardise at least half of the 56,000 affordable homes to rent which the Government hopes will be built by 2015, as contractors doubt whether they can recoup their costs from tenants.

Mr Pickles's spokesman stressed that the minister did not share the views in his private secretary's letter – and fully supported the moves to trim the benefit bill.

But last night Labour and Liberal Democrat opponents of the measure were circling in the House of Lords, which is considering the proposals in detail. They said they would use the leaked letter to argue their case and claimed their doubts about the scheme were shared by senior Conservatives. One Liberal Democrat peer said: "There will be a serious attempt to amend the Bill. The letter will reinforce out arguments."

Labour said the private letter vindicated its argument that the benefit cap could cost more than it saves and would increase homelessness.

Liam Byrne, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said: "We were assured by ministers that costs wouldn't rise. Now top-level leaks reveal the truth. Iain Duncan Smith has promised the House of Commons he will not U-turn on the benefits cap. Perhaps now David Cameron will order him to think again."

A spokesman for Mr Pickles said: "We are fully supportive of all the Government's policies on benefits. Clearly action is needed to tackle the housing benefit bill which has spiralled to £21 billion a year under Labour."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in