Local Council Elections 1994: Butler warning over impartiality
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CIVIL SERVANTS have been warned to remain impartial in the run-up to the local and European elections, writes Colin Brown.
The Prime Minister said in a Commons reply that Sir Robin Butler, the Cabinet Secretary and head of the Home Civil Service, had recently reminded civil servants of the code of conduct for elections, which emphasised the importance of political neutrality. Sir Robin told staff there was 'an increasing tendency by all political parties to approach local and European elections from a national point of view'.
He said departments should follow consistent principles when responding to requests for information in connection with election campaigns. They were advised to exercise particular care in issuing decisions with a local or European dimension.
There were five codes of conduct for civil servants: they should not be asked to engage in activities which called into question their political impartiality; they should be even-handed in providing information for candidates and replies should go through their ministers' private offices; factual information should be provided to the public and organisations; care should be taken on timing and announcement of sensitive decisions, and it may be better to delay some decisions; and special care should be taken in respect of new paid publicity campaigns.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments