Labour leadership: Lisa Nandy vows to maintain Corbyn’s pledge to abolish tuition fees
Leadership contender claims Labour’s 2019 policies were ‘reasonably popular’ but party failed to articulate them to public
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lisa Nandy has said she would maintain key pledges from Labour’s election manifesto, including the abolition of university of tuition fees and the renationalisation of Royal Mail.
In her first major television interview, the Wigan MP, one of five contenders vying to replace Jeremy Corbyn, also said she opposed a second Scottish independence vote, insisting voters have had “enough of referendums”.
Her remarks came as a poll of party members by the LabourList website and Survation suggested Rebecca Long-Bailey, the left-wing shadow business secretary, is narrowly ahead in the contest.
Appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Neil show, Ms Nandy insisted that most of the policies in Labour’s 2019 election manifesto “were reasonably popular”, but that the party failed to properly articulate them during the campaign.
“For example, there was a pledge on free broadband. It wasn’t very well explained, but it was a very good policy,” she said.
Pressed on whether she would keep Mr Corbyn’s proposal to abolish tuition fees, she replied: “Yes, I would, but in the language of priorities, where I would start is restoring education maintenance allowance and university grants.”
Ms Nandy added she would renew the Trident nuclear deterrent system – something the party’s election document pledged – if it was coupled with a “strong commitment to nuclear disarmament”.
Questioned on the contentious issue of a second referendum in Scotland, she said: “I think it suits the Scottish nationalists to keep this argument going about independence.
“I don’t support another referendum on independence, I think I’ve been very consistent about that – whether it’s Brexit or the Scottish independence referendum.
“Frankly, to be honest, I think this country has had enough of referendums. The job now is to pull together as a nation.”
Just moments before Ms Nandy’s appearance, however, results of a poll suggested the backbencher has a long way to go to convince Labour members she is the individual to succeed Mr Corbyn in three months’ time.
Results of the LabourList survey said Ms Long-Bailey would win 42 per cent of first preference votes – while Sir Keir Starmer, the shadow Brexit secretary, would be in second place with 37 per cent.
Backbenchers Jess Phillips and Lisa Nandy would receive nine and seven per cent of first preference votes respectively and the shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry, would secure just one per cent.
It added that Sir Keir would pick up the majority of second preferences from members, but it would not be sufficient to eliminate Ms Long-Bailey’s lead, with a final result of 51 to 49 per cent for the shadow business secretary. The survey of 3,835 members between 8 and 13 January, consisted of LabourList readers, which the website said was weighted by Survation to reflect the membership.
But given those polled are drawn from LabourList’s database of readers, who identify as members and are likely to be more engaged than the average party member, it may not be representative of the party’s entire membership.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments