Linguistics: We can't put a label on how awful this is...
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
The word of the week is omnishambles. Omnishambles. Roll it round your lips.
It was a word first used in an expletive-strewn rant by Malcolm Tucker in a lift in The Thick Of It. Recently it became part of the argot of journalists and Government special advisers after Tim Shipman, chairman of the Press Gallery of the House of Commons and deputy political editor of the Daily Mail, used it in private conversation to describe "level six of a 12-point scale" for measuring political disasters.
On Tuesday, Rachel Sylvester, the Times columnist, quoted "one government source" as saying: "I think the technical term is omnishambles." That gave the leader of the Opposition his opening at Prime Minister's Questions the next day. Just beforehand, Mr Shipman asked me: "What price Ed Miliband using the phrase 'omnishambles' in PMQs?"
He couldn't possibly, I said. That would be silly. How wrong I was.
"We are all keen to hear the Prime Minister's view", Mr Miliband said, "on why he thinks, four weeks on from the Budget, even people within Downing street are calling it an omnishambles Budget." Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. That killed it.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments