Liberal Democrats accuse police of 'aggressive' protest tactics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Police were today accused by the Liberal Democrats of adopting "aggressive and intimidatory" tactics against peaceful protesters.
Conference delegates hit out after trouble at the G20 demonstrations in the City of London in April and at Kingsnorth power station last year.
And they backed a motion condemning some of the tactics, like "kettling" where protesters are penned in for hours, as "fundamentally wrong".
Liberal Democrat MPs Tom Brake and Martin Horwood gave the Bournemouth gathering graphic first hand accounts of the G20 protests.
Mr Brake, a legal observer who found himself penned in for five hours, said that while police acted proportionately and professionally in dealing with a violent hard core, they were "less satisfactory" in dealing with the vast majority of peaceful protesters - denying many access to food, water and toilets.
Mr Horwood, the party's environment spokesman, blamed "aggressive" police actions for raising tensions at the climate change camp.
David Howarth, the party's justice spokesman, said something had gone "seriously wrong" with the way police were dealing with peaceful protests.
"What we were worried about is that the police had come to the conclusion that protest itself was illegitimate and any technical breach of the law justified the break-up or disruption of the protest."
He said the right to protest peacefully was a good thing and asked why police felt the need to film those who took part.
Dee Doocey, a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, described the developments as "disturbing" because it seemed police were working on the assumption that the protesters were criminals.
The "shameful behaviour" of a minority of officers was an "insult" to the vast majority, who did a "wonderful job".
Conference agreed it was unacceptable for police to prevent or disrupt legitimate protest and the use of "kettling" or baton charges must only be used when "absolutely necessary".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments