Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lib Dems at ‘make or break’ point on Rennard harassment allegations

 

Mark Leftly,Jane Merrick
Saturday 29 March 2014 21:27 EDT
Lord Rennard (right) at the Liberal Democrat conference
Lord Rennard (right) at the Liberal Democrat conference

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Liberal Democrats face a “make or break” meeting this week over the Lord Rennard harassment allegations that have threatened to overwhelm the party.

There is frustration that a mediation process between the peer and the four party activists who accused him of abusing his position has been moving at a painfully slow pace. Lord Rennard’s supporters believe there needs to be substantial progress to avoid a breakdown of talks. The peer threatened the party with legal action after he was suspended in January.

A senior Lib Dem said: “If mediation is going to succeed, it would have to succeed soon. It is make or break early this week.”

The suspension followed an inquiry by Alistair Webster QC, who concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove the complaints beyond reasonable doubt, but added they were “broadly credible” and called on Lord Rennard to apologise. The latter refused, arguing this amounted to an admission of guilt over allegations he denies.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in