Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lee Rigby murder: Tory MP demands answers from security services over plan to recruit Michael Adebolajo

 

Jamie Merrill
Saturday 06 December 2014 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Conservative MP has called for the security services to respond to claims that they were involved in the questioning and alleged mistreatment of Lee Rigby's killer by Kenyan security services in 2010, three years before he went on to murder the young soldier in south London.

The call from Andrew Tyrie MP comes after The Independent on Sunday disclosed the role of the British security services in a complex plan to recruit Michael Adebolajo following a trip he made to Kenya to attend a terrorist training camp.

On Friday Mr Tyrie wrote to the chair of the Intelligence Security Committee, Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP, asking him to call spy bosses back to answer further questions about the role played by British security services.

Mr Tyrie's letter says the ISC report on the intelligence failures allows for the possibility that UK officials behaved in a way that enabled them to "disengage from legal obligations" on treatment of prisoners – in other words, to bypass the rules.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in