Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Leaders clash on 'pensions warnings'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN MAJOR yesterday faced calls for ministerial resignations over the Maxwell pensions scandal, as he and Neil Kinnock clashed angrily in the Commons over the affair.

The Labour leader demanded to know why ministers had failed to act on repeated warnings from the Investment Management Regulatory Organisation that pension law was inadequate. An increasingly angry Mr Major accused Mr Kinnock of smears and of trying to spread blame in a 'truly disgraceful' fashion.

Last night, Dr Marjorie Mowlem, Labour's City spokesperson, called on the Prime Minister to apologise as she produced a report from Imro to the Commons Social Security Committee underlining that it had sent a specially commissioned study of the incompatibility of trust and financial services law to the Government. That incompatibility 'much handicapped' the supervisors, Imro said.

The clash came as Mr Kinnock recalled at Prime Minister's questions that George Nissen, Imro's chairman, had said in his resignation statements on Monday that 'for some years we have been telling the Government of the problems of pension and trust law'.

Mr Kinnock said: 'Why did the Government take no effective action in response to these repeated warnings from the regulatory body?'

The Prime Minister said he did not accept Mr Kinnock's conclusion, and that the Government had made a series of announcements about short-term action. It was still awaiting information about the Maxwell affair.

Mr Kinnock retorted that he and everyone else was inclined to believe Mr Nissen's word, and asked again if it was not the case that 'over a period of years and long before the Maxwell scandal, the regulatory body was giving warnings of the problems to the Government?'

Mr Nissen, he said, had taken his share of the responsibility and resigned, while stressing that no one should attach the blame solely to Imro. 'When we can expect the Government to take its share of the responsibility, and when can we expect ministers to follow Mr Nissen's example?' he asked.

At that, Mr Major said: 'You are seeking to spread blame where it doesn't exist, in a truly disgraceful way. You may seek to smear, but you will have to wait until the information is available.'

He implied Mr Kinnock had done the same last year over the collapse of BCCI, although the Government-commissioned inquiry report into BCCI has yet to be published. Mr Major said he understood that the Securities and Investments Board wanted to publish as much as possible about its inquiry into the Maxwell affair. But to publish it in full could be 'severely prejudicial to criminal proceedings'.

Amid mounting uproar, he demanded of Mr Kinnock: 'Are you so concerned to make a party point that you are not concerned with the law of the land?'

The clash came as Peter Lilley, Secretary of State for Social Security, finally laid the regulations which will make pension funds creditors of employers that are wound up. Although the change in the law - first trailed two years ago - will apply to the Maxwell companies, it is not greatly expected to benefit their pensioners.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in