Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
Labour would scrap the Tories’ ‘bedroom tax’ on the first day of a Miliband-led government, the party’s leader has said.
In a speech on the campaign trail today Ed Miliband said his government would immediately set up a “hardship fund” to compensate people who had to pay the charge while its official abolition was steered through parliament.
“We'll get to work immediately to ensure that families no longer lose out. So on day one of a Labour government, we free families from the burden of the bedroom tax,” he said.
The penalty payments, referred to by the government as the ‘under-occupancy penalty’, are a reduction to housing benefit paid to social tenants with rooms deemed by ministers to be “spare”.
Though the charge was initially conceived to encourage people to move to houses with fewer rooms, critics say that in many areas there are a limited number of smaller homes for social rent to move into.
People with such ‘spare’ rooms can have their housing benefit payments reduced by as much as 25%.
A significant portion of people hit by the charge are disabled, according to official statistics. In July 2013 the High Court said the charge discriminated against disable adults but said this was lawful.
The Conservatives say the bedroom tax as is fair and point to similar rules for tenants in private rented accodation. The Liberal Democrats say they would bring in exemptions to the charges.
The Green Party, SNP, Ukip, and Plaid Cymru all also say they would abolish the tax.
Labour has previously committed to ending the underoccupancy charge but had not laid out a time scale.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments