Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour unveils 'learn as you earn' scheme

Donald Macintyre
Wednesday 27 March 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour will today unveil a new pounds 300m training policy under which the state will pay pounds 150 into a new training "smart card" for 1 million employees to learn new skills - provided the worker contributes pounds 25.

David Blunkett, the party's education and employment spokesman, will unveil Labour's alternative training plan and risk a trade union outcry by dumping Labour's long-held commitment to a compulsory levy on firms which do not provide adequate training.

In the "Learn as you Earn" programme which Mr Blunkett will launch today, joined in a television link from the Staffordshire South East by-election by the Labour leader, Tony Blair, the combination of state and individual payments can be topped up by tax- deductible payments by employers and employees.

The second component of the scheme is an expansion of the existing "Investing in People" programme to smaller firms at a cost of a further pounds 150m.

The already planned scheme would provide significant tax credits to larger firms providing quality training. Mr Blunkett will argue it can be largely funded from pounds 200m unclaimed from the European Social Fund.

The two schemes, along with the already announced University of Industry to provide hi-tech on-the-job distance training to employees, are an alternative to the training levy which has been part of Labour policy for the last three general elections.

The new pounds 150-per-person grant is expected to draw a warm welcome from the CBI as a much better alternative than the old levy policy and has been discussed with the Training and Enterprise Councils. Labour says it can be largely funded from existing TEC budgets.

But the idea of an "individual learning account" may provoke hostility from some trade unions wedded to the idea of a levy - which would have forced revenue from employers not already providing training up to an approved level. The trailed decision to abandon the levy is yet another sign of Labour's steady dumping of traditionalist policies.

Labour's figures show that only one in five companies at present provides serious training and there are 7 million employed people without qualifications. Less than 25 per cent receive training up to the standards operated by the "Investing in People" scheme.

Because of the use of existing resources the scheme will be cited as another example of the "low cost or no cost" imaginative measures which Mr Blair recently exhorted shadow Cabinet members to come up with in a private letter.

Today's will be the first of a series of papers which the party will be producing between now and June. These will supplement existing policies and be distilled into a document which Mr Blair described yesterday as an "early version" of the party's election manifesto.

Labour NEC rejects 'terrorist' candidate

The Labour Party asked John Lloyd, its prospective candidate for Exeter, to stand down yesterday following allegations about his involvement in terrorist activities in South Africa.

The National Executive Committee accused him or providing misleading information after he failed to revealbeing a member of the African Resistance Movement, which opposed apartheid by bombing targets such as electricity pylons in the 1960s.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in