Labour says millionaire donors believe in party
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Charles Clarke, the Labour chairman, stepped into the Mittal affair yesterday with a staunch defence of the party's millionaire donors.
He said big backers such as the Indian steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal did not offer their cash to buy government policies, politicians or honours, but "because they believe in politics and in the party they support".
Mr Clarke also rejected criticism of the special adviser system that blew up around Jo Moore in the Department for Transport. He told a seminar of the Social Market Foundation that coverage of the Mittal affair and the resignations of Ms Moore and the civil servant Martin Sixsmith had generated "heat and vitriol rather than light and understanding".
He said many of Labour's donors gave money because they felt they were levelling the playing field to counter the Tories, who had always had access to "enormous and secret private funding". He added that the Government had made the process more transparent.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments