Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour Party Conference: Delegates ask - why is G4S guarding us?

 

Mark Leftly
Tuesday 23 September 2014 19:54 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior Labour MPs, including members of the shadow cabinet, are dismayed that G4S is providing security at the party conference this week.

Protesters outside the conference in Manchester were furious that Labour is using a company that provides security systems for Israeli prisons that hold Palestinians – facilities where there is evidence that children have been ill-treated and tortured.

It is understood that at least one member of the shadow cabinet told the Party’s administrators it should not use G4S, but the request was denied. A close confidant of leader Ed Miliband added that they wanted to “chop” G4S, which is the biggest employer listed on the London Stock Exchange, with more than 600,000 staff. G4S said it “takes very seriously our obligations to ensure our activities do not contribute to human rights abuses”

In 2012, Mr Miliband called on the Coalition to temporarily ban G4S from bidding on public-sector contracts after it failed to provide enough security guards for the London Olympics. He was embarrassed to learn G4S had already been contracted to run that year’s conference security.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in