Labour MP apologises for 'confusion' over Labour's shoot-to-kill policy after Jeremy Corbyn 'U-turn'
Jeremy Corbyn clarified his position on 'shoot-to-kill' in a statement to Labour's ruling NEC, saying he supported the use of 'whatever proportionate and strictly necessary force is required to save life'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Labour MP has apologised for the confusion over the Labour party's position on shoot-to-kill after Jeremy Corbyn backtracked on his opposition to the policy.
On Monday the Labour leader said he was "not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy," after being asked whether he would be prepared to order police or the military to kill attackers if there was a Paris-style terrorist attack in Britain.
But on Tuesday Mr Corbyn rowed back on the comments, making it clear that he would authorise police to kill terrorists if that was required to save civilian lives.
Appearing on live TV on Tuesday, Labour MP John Woodcock said: "I can only apologise to Sky viewers for the confusion over the last 24 hours but I'm glad that our leader Jeremy Corbyn has retracted, or at least clarified, his remarks of yesterday and said that he would support it too."
Mr Corbyn had faced a furious backlash from Labour MPs at a party meeting on Monday evening, with his leadership rival Yvette Cooper asking why he opposed the "long-standing legal framework" that allowed police officers to shoot-to-kill if there was an "imminent threat to life".
Some Labour MPs went further in attacking Mr Corbyn with one shadow minister even branding him a "f****** disgrace" for failing to justify his position.
Mr Corbyn clarified his position on shoot-to-kill in a statement to a meeting of Labour’s ruling NEC.
“As we have seen in the recent past, there are clear dangers to us all in any kind of shoot-to-kill policy,” he wrote.
“And we must ensure that terrorist attacks are not used to undermine the very freedoms and legal protections we are determined to defend.
“But of course I support the use of whatever proportionate and strictly necessary force is required to save life in response to attacks of the kind we saw in Paris.”
Some Labour MPs said Mr Corbyn had initially expressed opposition to shoot-to-kill because he was still stuck in the mindset of the threat posed by the IRA and the controversy over the policy in the 1970s and 1980s.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments