Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour has 'no God-given right to exist' and could do 'even worse' at next election, Liz Kendall warns

Ms Kendall has positioned herself as the 'candidate of change' in what is expected to be a three-horse race against Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper

Andrew Grice
Friday 22 May 2015 02:46 EDT
Comments
Liz Kendall set out her approach as a Labour leader, pledging to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence
Liz Kendall set out her approach as a Labour leader, pledging to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence (Rex)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Liz Kendall, the Blairite candidate in the Labour leadership contest, issued a stark warning that the party has “no God-given right to exist” as she warned that it could do “even worse” at the 2020 election than in this month’s “catastrophic defeat.”

The mountain facing the party was illustrated when John Curtice, the leading psephologist, said a Labour victory at the 2020 election was “improbable.” He calculated that Labour would need a huge 12.5 per cent lead over the Conservatives to regain power if the Scottish National Party maintained its support north of the border.

Ms Kendall, an MP for only five years, positioned herself as the “candidate of change” in what is expected to be a three-horse race against Andy Burnham and Yvette Cooper, who were both Cabinet ministers in the previous Labour Government.

Unveiling her platform in a speech to Westminster journalists, Ms Kendall made a surprise move to outflank the Tories on defence. She said Labour would ensure the UK met the Nato target to spend 2 per cent of GDP on defence – a pledge that David Cameron and George Osborne have refused to make as they plan further spending cuts. She said: “Under my leadership, Labour will no longer stand idly by while the Prime Minister weakens our country and allows the world to become less secure.”

Ms Kendall disowned the agenda pursued under Ed Miliband’s leadership, saying it was a “fantasy” that the British public had shifted to the left. “I want to lead a Labour Party that’s genuinely as passionate about wealth creation as we are about wealth distribution,” she said.

Arguing for radical public service reforms, she said she would not “waste time obsessing about school structures”, adding: “If a school is providing a great education—whether it’s a local authority, academy or free school – we will back it up. Full stop.” She criticised Mr Miliband’s pledge of an energy price freeze and cut in university tuition fees.

Criticising trade union bosses, Ms Kendall said: “This election can't be about who the general secretaries say impresses them most, or who makes the Labour Party comfortable, or who is the best candidate in 2015. It must be about who has got the best chance of winning and changing the country in 2020. That means facing up to the depth of our defeat and the scale of change needed. This defeat was epic, we lost by a magnitude few predicted or imagined.”

She said labels like “Blairite” belonged to the past and described herself as “a moderniser who is true to our [Labour] values.”

Ms Kendall argued: “We don’t just need to change a little bit here or there where it’s easy….We need a completely different approach.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in