Labour democracy battle comes to head
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE BATTLE between the Labour leadership and the big unions over party democracy will come to a head today.
Supporters of John Smith, the Labour leader, will attempt to thwart attempts by unions to maintain their power in party elections. Mr Smith and other senior party figures are keen to ensure that a meeting of a review committee leaves open the option of one member one vote (OMOV).
If the move is successful, the committee will make no hard and fast recommendations about the future of the relationship of the party and unions. The decision over the democratic structure of the party will then be left to Labour's national executive in January or February.
Mr Smith's key ally on the committee, the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union, yesterday declared its opposition to a paper prepared by Labour headquarters effectively guiding the discussion way from OMOV towards a system in which unions maintained an influence. It suggested a method whereby union members who pay the political levy could participate in the election of Labour leaders and in the selection of MPs. A revised document to be presented to today's meeting will be less prescriptive.
Most of the union representatives seem prepared to support the concept of 'registered supporters', whereby payers of the political levy would present themselves as Labour backers who then qualify for a vote. Their votes would be expressed in electoral colleges for the leadership and the selection of MPs.
Nigel Harris, a member of the AEEU executive with a seat on the review group, yesterday told his union's executive that the 'registered supporters' system for the selection of MPs was 'horrendous' and 'deeply flawed'. Most unions did not have the ability to identify their political levy payers in each constituency.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments