Labour anti-Semitism row reignites as senior figures split over Ken Livingstone expulsion
John McDonnell and Emily Thornberry gave diverging views in back-to-back interviews
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour anti-Semitism difficulties have flared after two top figures took different views within minutes of each other on whether Ken Livingstone should be expelled from the party.
Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry said in one TV interview that the former London Mayor should be thrown out for offensive comments he made about Hitler and Zionism.
Just moments earlier in an interview on another channel shadow Chancellor John McDonnell refused to say the same, claiming it would prejudge findings of the party’s ruling executive on the matter.
It follows an 11-month investigation into Mr Livingstone’s comments which concluded they were offensive, but that he should only be suspended for another year rather than expelled.
The judgement angered Labour figures who saw it as too lenient. It also precipitated a string of further interviews from Mr Livingstone in which he repeated the offensive comments – something leader Jeremy Corbyn said may be grounds for a second investigation.
Asked on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show about Mr Livingstone’s words, Ms Thornberry branded them “a complete insult.”
She went on: “I was surprised that he wasn’t thrown out. I think that he should have been.”
But on Sky’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday, Mr McDonnell refused to go as far, saying only that Mr Livingstone “should have apologised.”
Then he said: “What will now happen is that the NEC will consider this matter again and there’ll be further consideration of the matter.
“I’m not saying anything that will prejudge that process and what will come out of it. But my advice to Ken is apologise.”
More widely on the recent furore over alleged anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, Mr McDonnell said: “It’s a tragedy. It’s an absolute tragedy. I could weep.”
He went on: “I believe our party is still the anti-racist party that I joined. I think there is anti-Semitism in our community and it will pervade all our institutions and we’ve got to root it out.
“The shock for me is that, the figures last year, 1,300 anti-Semitic incidents and hate crimes were reported across our whole community.
“Labour should be at the forefront of confronting that. Instead we are involved in this internal examination and exploration of what’s been going on in the last 12 months around Ken Livingstone. We’ve got to close that down and move on.”
Almost half of Labour’s 229 MPs have signed an open letter warning that the decision not to expel Mr Livingstone over his comments is a “betrayal” of the party’s values.
A total of 107 MPs, along with 48 Labour peers, put their name to the Jewish Labour Movement statement criticising the move to only hand Mr Livingstone an additional one-year suspension.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments