Labour admits breaking law on party donations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour admitted 120 breaches of the law on political donations worth a total of £300,000 yesterday, after they were uncovered by an internal audit of local party accounts.
David Triesman, the party's general secretary, wrote to the Electoral Commission, the watchdog that monitors political donations, to give details of the cases. He called for local treasurers to be given more help and for the regulations governing donations to be simplified to prevent unintended breaches of the law.
Mr Triesman's letter warned: "We are dependent on the voluntary activity of ordinary party members who are increasingly unwilling, especially in a climate of legal penalty, to undertake work of this level of detail."
Officials insisted the problems had arisen through mistakes. The breaches emerged after Mr Triesman ordered an internal audit to ensure local parties were complying with new laws requiring all donations over £1,000 to be declared.Mr Triesman told The Times: "We are not seeking to duck responsibility or make any excuses. These laws are there for the right reasons, but there is no suggestion of sleaze or even that anyone broke them willingly."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments