AI tech giants should not be subsidised by British creatives, Starmer signals
The Prime Minister was grilled about proposals to regulate artificial intelligence’s (AI) impact on copyright as he faced questions from senior MPs.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tech giants should not get a subsidy off the back of British creative industries, the Prime Minister signalled.
Sir Keir Starmer was grilled about proposals to regulate artificial intelligence’s (AI) impact on copyright as he faced questions from a committee of senior MPs.
The Government is currently consulting on plans which could allow AI firms to scrape media companies content, unless they specifically opt out.
AI companies have scraped the internet of books, of films, of music, all created by others, without permission. It is effective the largest heist of copyright in world history
The Prime Minister denied the Government’s proposals were akin to allowing a burglar to steal belongings.
Dame Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chairwoman of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee warned the Prime Minister he was “gambling a world-class British success story” of the creative industries.
She told the Liaison Committee of senior MPs: “The creative industries are worth £125 billion to our economy, they fly our flag around the world and you are gambling them in favour of companies that are already so rich that your own Secretary of State said we need to treat them like nation states.
“Why should these overseas tech giants effectively get a free subsidy on the back of British creatives?”
Sir Keir replied: “I don’t think they should, I think we need to get the balance right, but I also think we have a huge opportunity.
“We are one of the top three in the world in AI at the very point where AI is going to be transformative.
“That puts us in a really good position against our competitors around the world, I don’t want us to lose that edge.”
Dame Caroline had earlier told the Prime Minister the creative industries were an important part of the UK’s economic growth, and had been “growing at twice the rate of the rest of the economy”.
She added: “Yet AI companies have scraped the internet of books, of films, of music, all created by others, without permission.
“It is effective the largest heist of copyright in world history.”
Dame Caroline continued: “You are proposing to take rights away and force creatives to opt back into their own copyright. It is a bit like saying a burglar can nick all your stuff and then that is all fine as long as you have got a sign up saying that that is not okay.”
Sir Keir replied: “I don’t see if like that. I think it is a question of how you get the balance right.
“There are some advocates of opt-in, some advocates of opt-out. We have put a proposal on the table and we are consulting on it, and obviously when that consultation is over we will have a look at the responses we have got.”
He later described the UK’s creative industries as “really important”, and claimed they have “soft power to die for”.