Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jowell: public inquiry 'would be a diversion'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tessa Jowell, the Culture Secretary, has ruled out a public inquiry into the July 7 bombings, warning that it would be an expensive diversion for the police and security services.

Muslim groups and the families of some victims have demanded an investigation similar to the US commission that examined the background to the September 11 attacks. They argue that many questions about last year's bombings remain, including whether intelligence failings contributed to the attacks.

Ms Jowell said she recognised the "raw grief, frustration and anger" of many families, but insisted that an official inquiry could take "years and years" to answer their questions.

"If there was a genuine belief in government that a public inquiry would answer questions which have not yet been answered, then of course it would be held," she told BBC Breakfast. "The concern is that these families would not get the answers to the questions that they seek. There would be an enormous diversion of security resources which need to be directed to prevent this happening again. The costs would be enormous ... money spent on the inquiry that could be spent on better surveillance."

The Government has dug in its heels against an inquiry for months. Last week Tony Blair said that it would divert "resources, energy and commitment from the police and the security services".

John Reid, the Home Secretary, has even argued that it would put lives at risk because of the amount of police and security service time it would consume.

The Home Office has published a narrative of the events and the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee has also examined the background to the bombings.

But critics say no one has scrutinised allegations that one or two of the bombers came to the attention of the security services who then eliminated them from their inquiries.

Nor has there been an official investigation into whether the men acted on their own, whether they had links to al-Qa'ida, and how they became radicalised.

The Liberal Democrats have protested that the two reports were "limited in scope" and are backing a public inquiry.

David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, has called for an inquiry similar to the Franks Committee, which examined the causes of the Falklands War. He has accepted that some hearings would have to be held in private, but stressed that it should be conducted by a senior independent public figure.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in