Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jeremy Corbyn not trusted to safeguard national security by 71% of Britons

Exclusive: Survey's findings will worry Labour leader, with 54% of participants trusting David Cameron

Andrew Grice
Sunday 27 December 2015 16:13 EST
Comments
According to an ORB poll for The Independent seven out of 10 people do not trust Jeremy Corbyn to safeguard Britain’s national security
According to an ORB poll for The Independent seven out of 10 people do not trust Jeremy Corbyn to safeguard Britain’s national security (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Seven out of 10 people do not trust Jeremy Corbyn to safeguard Britain’s national security, according to an ORB poll for The Independent. Fifty-four per cent trust David Cameron to maintain the country’s security, while 46 per cent do not.

The findings of the survey of 2,000 people will worry Labour critics of their party leader, who claim that people would not vote for a potential prime minister they regard as weak on security.

Terrorism, the Syria crisis and the question of whether to renew Britain’s Trident nuclear weapons system are bound to keep the issue in the spotlight in 2016.

Lord (John) Hutton, the former Labour Defence Secretary, branded Mr Corbyn a threat to national security after the Labour leader said he would never press the nuclear button. The poll found that only 29 per cent of people trusted Mr Corbyn on the issue, while 71 per cent did not.

According to the results, men are more likely than women to have faith in Mr Cameron on security. Six out of 10 men (59 per cent) trust him on the issue, compared with 49 per cent of women.

Young adults are more likely to trust Mr Corbyn to maintain national security than older people. The Labour leader has the confidence of 44 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds on the issue, although 56 per cent do not share it. But only 18 per cent of those aged 65 and over trust him on security, while 82 per cent do not.

A majority of people in the top AB and middle CI and C2 social groups trust the Prime Minister to safeguard security. But a minority (45 per cent) in the bottom DE group agree with this statement. However, Mr Corbyn fares worse among this group: only 28 per cent of DEs trust him on the issue, while 72 per cent disagree.

Corbyn makes terror warning

Mr Corbyn rejected pressure from some of his own MPs to distance himself from the Stop the War Coalition, which he chaired until winning the Labour leadership in September. His decision to attend its pre-Christmas fundraising dinner angered some Labour MPs.

In an interview with the Huffington Post website, Mr Corbyn confirmed a report in The Independent in November that he could call an online ballot of Labour members on Trident.

He opposes the party’s policy of renewing it and a ballot could help persuade Labour’s annual conference, which will have the final say, to back his stance.

Although the Labour leader opposed extending UK air strikes against Isis to Syria, a revolt by his Shadow Cabinet forced him to allow his MPs a free vote.

Corbyn allies insist he is “not a pacifist” but argue that he was never going to turn his back on the 250,000 people who voted for him to be party leader.

They also point out that he clarified his remarks opposing a shoot-to-kill policy against terrorists after the Paris attacks. He later accepted that UK police should use any “strictly necessary force”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in