Jeremy Corbyn awaits High Court ruling on whether he needs MPs’ nominations to stand in Labour leadership election
'The NEC is entitled to great respect and the court should not interfere with it'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jeremy Corbyn is due to learn if he could be excluded from the Labour Party leadership contest, as the High Court rules on whether he must seek nominations from MPs to appear on the ballot.
The High Court case, brought by Michael Foster, a major Labour Party donor, claims that the party’s governing body – the National Executive Committee – “misapplied” the contest rules by allowing Mr Corbyn's automatic inclusion on the ballot paper without having to seek nominations.
Mr Foster is challenging the ruling that Mr Corbyn, as the incumbent, had the automatic right to be on the ballot paper in a leadership election, whereas any challenger would have to collect nominations from at least 50 Labour MPs or MEPs. Many believe that if Mr Corbyn had to go down this route he would fail to secure the nominations needed – just 40 MPs backed him while 172 voted against him in a no confidence motion last month.
Mr Justice Foskett is set to rule this afternoon on the case and may also set out grounds on which the losing party might appeal.
The case was originally brought against Labour’s general secretary, Iain McNicol, but Mr Corbyn won the right to fight it, because of the impact it could potentially have on him – though he is not expected to put in a personal appearance in court.
It is not certain what would happen if the court rules against him, because nominations have closed and, on the face of it, the former shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Owen Smith would be the only candidate left in the field. The party could also return to the nomination stage and go through it again, enabling Mr Corbyn to seek nominations.
Mark Henderson, counsel for Mr McNicol, however, said the rules were not ambiguous or open to serious doubt and argued the NEC’s decision was “plainly right”. “In any case, the conclusion reached by the NEC is entitled to great respect and the court should not interfere with it,” he added.
The party’s constitution says that where is no vacancy for leader, “nominations may be sought by potential challengers.” They require 20 per cent of the party’s MPs to be valid.
Mr McNicol announced a leadership election on July 11 but frontrunner Angela Eagle withdrew from the race, leaving Owen Smith to take on Mr Corbyn, who became leader in September last year.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments