Iraq protester wins right to maintain vigil at Parliament
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The High Court ruled yesterday that the curbs on protests around the Palace of Westminster did not cover Mr Haw, even though they were written to force him to leave. The rules force protesters to obtain permission from the police to demonstrate around Parliament. But Mr Haw's lawyers said the rules only covered protests called after 1 August.
Lady Justice Smith said that a drafting error meant the 2005 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act did not cover Mr Haw's demonstration. "If Parliament wishes to criminalise any particular activity, it must do so in clear terms."
Mr Haw welcomed the decision. He said: "For centuries, British citizens have had the right to protest outside the Mother of Parliaments. Now this is to be left to the diktat of the police."
The Home Office said that it was considering the judgment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments