Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Investment post faces scrutiny

Colin Brown,Political Correspondent
Wednesday 17 February 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE TREASURY yesterday appointed a senior civil servant to co-ordinate private investment in public sector projects, including the Channel tunnel link, the Jubilee Line, and the Birmingham north relief road.

But Stephen Dorrell, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, denied that private sector involvement in public schemes was 'creative accounting' to reduce public sector debt, when he encountered scepticism from members of the cross-party Commons Treasury Select Committee.

He told the committee the appointment of Steve Robson as head of the public enterprise group at the Treasury followed John Major's easing of Treasury rules to encourage more private investment in public schemes.

The Prime Minister announced in 1989 that he was discontinuing the Treasury rules which had inhibited private investment. The Treasury had insisted that such schemes should only go ahead if they were more cost-effective than publicly funded projects.

Few schemes were able to meet the Treasury critiera, because the Government was able to borrow money more cheaply than private firms. However, the Chancellor announced a further shift in policy in his Autumn Statement.

'If the public sector secures good value for money for the contribution it makes where the private sector is a major partner, that should satisfy our criteria. That is the major change we are seeking to introduce,' Mr Dorrell said.

He said the Treasury was not seeking to provide private funds for traditional public schemes, which would have been carried out anyway. It was an attempt to provide schemes on a fundamentally different basis. The Treasury would take into account the management expertise which the private sector would inject into public schemes.

Officials said the Treasury was encouraging more private sector involvement in energy saving schemes, and would shortly issue guidelines on leasing, contracting and joint ventures between the public and private sectors.

But Quentin Davies, a Tory backbencher, protested about the 'muddle' in the Treasury's appraisal of private investment in road and rail projects.

Nicholas Budgen, a Tory anti- Maastricht rebel, accused the Government of thinking up ways of trying to resuscitate the construction industry after 'screwing' the economy with the European exchange rate mechanism.

The Treasury currently expects a rate of return of about 8 per cent on capital investment in public schemes, but that is being reviewed, the committee was told by Kingsley Jones, head of economic expenditure, in the control division at the Treasury.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in