Hurd warned of Tories' worry over Bosnia action
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TORY ANXIETY about the escalation of action in Bosnia surfaced at a backbench meeting with Douglas Hurd, the Foreign Secretary, and Malcolm Rifkind, Secretary of State for Defence.
Some Tory MPs privately warned that engaging British troops in a civil war in Bosnia would split the Tory party.
The deep concern was felt right up to the level of the Cabinet. 'It won't split the party . . . if it works,' one senior Cabinet minister said.
The Tory backbenchers, at a meeting of the defence and foreign affairs committees, were assured by Mr Rifkind that British troops were not in any immediate danger from Serb retaliation.
The backbenchers were told the British troops were mainly in Muslim-held and Croatian areas, beyond the fire power of the Serbs.
One of those at the meeting estimated that there were three Tory MPs against British support for air strikes, but the majority were 'reluctantly in favour'.
Several Tory MPs privately said Britain was being dragged into action and a possible war because it did not want to upset the Atlantic alliance with the United States.
'The minute a bomb drops on a school, where the Serb gunners have concealed their guns, public support will dissolve,' one ministerial aide said. 'It is very dangerous.'
Anti-Maastricht Tory MPs were also opposed to the action, which they saw as part of a European common foreign policy. About 40 Tory MPs attended the meeting. 'It was thinly attended, because not many really believe the shooting will start. But those with a military background are very concerned,' another who attended said.
Sir Nicholas Bonsor, chairman of the cross-party select committee on defence, said: 'There is a worry that having entered into this course of action, it may be extremely difficult to stop getting dragged further into the conflict.'
Douglas Hogg, Foreign Office minister, and Jeremy Hanley, Minister of State for the Armed Forces, also faced opposition from Tory MPs.
Mr Hurd's repeated emphasis yesterday on the importance of British backing for the Franco-US driven ultimatum to the future of the alliance appeared to have swung many MPs into support last night. Senior British officials acknowledge that wholehearted backing in Europe for a tough line will help President Bill Clinton to damp down internal criticism of the level of US Nato commitments in Europe.
At the same time Whitehall officials also maintain that a quid pro quo for the accord over Bosnia with the US will be Washington's strengthened diplomatic support for peace efforts. Paddy Ashdown, the Liberal Democrat leader, said the ultimatum would shift the balance of power in Bosnia because the Muslims had greater strength in infantry while the Serbian strength was in artillery.
Yugoslav army warning, page 12
Leading article, page 17
Andrew Marr, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments