Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Human Rights Act 'was used as scapegoat'

Ben Russell
Monday 13 November 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior ministers have been accused of fuelling public concern about the Human Rights Act by using it as a scapegoat for failings in the Government.

In a report, the Parliamentary Human Rights Committee said ministers had wrongly blamed the Act or its interpretation in three controversial cases: the comments by the Home Secretary, John Reid, on the deportation of foreign prisoners; the Afghan hijackers who won an appeal against deportation; and Anthony Rice, a sex offender who killed Naomi Bryant shortly after being released from prison.

In all these cases, ministers had criticised the Human Rights Act even though it did not apply. The report said: "The Human Rights Act has been used as a convenient scapegoat for unrelated administrative failings within government.

"In each case very senior ministers, from the Prime Minister down, made assertions that the Human Rights Act, or judges or officials interpreting it, were responsible for certain unpopular events when ... in each case these assertions were unfounded."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in