Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Huge election majority guarantees hunting ban

Marie Woolf
Wednesday 13 June 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A ban on fox hunting was in prospect last night after Labour MPs were reassured by Robin Cook that the Government would include a Bill in next week's Queen's Speech.

Meanwhile, Downing Street has privately told anti-hunting groups that "the middle way is dead" and that Labour's huge parliamentary majority will guarantee a push towards an outright ban on hunting with hounds.

Leaders of animal welfare organisations, including the powerful International Fund for Animal Welfare, met ministers and Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair's chief of staff, shortly before the general election and received reassurances about a ban, The Independent has learnt.

Mr Powell assured them that the Government would not back the compromise "middle way" option and would proceed with the Bill banning hunting with dogs if Labour gained a landslide.

"Jonathan Powell said the middle way is dead. He said if there is a big majority and no backlash from the countryside there would be a ban. We have been told the Bill will be tabled early in the Parliament," said an animal welfare source.

At yesterday's meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party ­ the first since the general election ­ Robin Cook, the new Leader of the House, told MPs of the Government's intention to bring forward a Bill early in the lifetime of the Parliament.

This is the strongest indication yet that the Government is keeping the option of using the Parliament Act to overrule a vote against a ban in the House of Lords.

To use the procedural tool, which allows the House of Commons to prevail when the Lords blocks contentious legislation, the Bill must have been debated in two consecutive sessions of Parliament, which means it must be debated in this session.

"We are very optimistic that this is included in the Queen's Speech," said Tony Banks, the Labour MP for West Ham, who has led the backbench campaign for a ban. "In the general election the people have spoken and the answer is that we must ban hunting. The middle way is not an option."

Kate Hoey, the middle way's chief backer within government, was replaced as Sports minister by Richard Caborn last week.

In the last Parliament, the fox-hunting Bill did not complete its passage through Parliament, despite being given government time. But in this Parliament Tony Blair is expected to introduce the same Bill and allow MPs to have a free vote after being advised that he will face a revolt by his own backbenchers unless early action is taken.

About 160 Labour MPs signed a pledge to work to ban hunting before the general election, and animal welfare groups decided not to attack the Government during the campaign on the expectation of Labour bringing in a ban.

The only sticking point for the Government was a fear that pro-hunting groups could mobilise during the election.

Jonathan Powell is said to have told animal-welfare groups that a condition of proceeding with a ban was for no backlash by countryside groups to occur in the general election.

Downing Street told animal-welfare groups it was concerned that hunting could become an election issue and that anti-hunting MPs, who were the target of countryside campaigners, could lose their seats or have their majorities reduced. But of the 29 rural Labour-held marginals that were the target of countryside campaigners, 18 saw a swing from Conservative to Labour candidates. Labour MPs who led calls for a ban, including Peter Bradley, chairman of the rural group of Labour MPs, had a swing from the Tories.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in