Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howells in row over 'no-torture' memos

Anne Penketh
Sunday 05 February 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Kim Howells, the outspoken Foreign Office minister, has ignited a furious row with human rights campaigners after attacking their "condescending liberal" and "colonial" attitude to the Government's policy of signing "no torture" memos with Middle East states.

In an interview with The Independent, Mr Howells was asked to comment on the criticism, voiced by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, that memorandums of understanding signed with such countries as Jordan, Libya and Lebanon are "not worth the paper they are written on".

"They're very wrong," Dr Howells responded. "This is a real leftover from a colonial attitude, quite frankly. You can't ...work with countries to improve their human rights records and when they make great strides to do that, then say 'Oh well, we don't believe them'. This is such a condescending liberal - with a small l - attitude towards these countries."

The controversy arose when the Government announced that to meet the standards of the British courts, it would negotiate agreements with individual states to ensure deported terror suspects would not be tortured on returning to their respective countries.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in