Howard warns of election threat to Atlantic alliance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The election of a new American president next week will inevitably lead to a review of the superpower's defence commitment in Europe, MPs warned yesterday.
The election of a new American president next week will inevitably lead to a review of the superpower's defence commitment in Europe, MPs warned yesterday.
Michael Howard, the former cabinet minister and Tory MP for Folkestone and Hythe, during the second day of a defence debate, stressed that the change in president would mean that Britain "must seek" to minimise "points of friction" and not add to them.
"It is almost inevitable that the new US administration will want to review the US contribution to the defence of Europe and the role of Nato. That review will take place at a time when the Atlantic partnership is under strain," he said.
"That partnership has been one of the greatest forces for good in the world as a whole over the last 50 years or more. Yet the Government of the UK, at this critical time ... has embarked on a defence initiative which will inevitably exacerbate the strains and risk."
Arguing against a European Army, he said the last thing the UK wanted was to "fritter away scarce resources on an unnecessary new set of bureaucratic arrangements" outside the framework of Nato which "already duplicate" those in Nato.
Mike Gapes, a Labour member of the Defence Select Committee, said the greatest threat to Nato did not come from Europe but the Republican Party. We need a "US engaged in Europe" not, as "George W Bush wants" to withdraw its resources from Kosovo, he warned.
Earlier, John Spellar, a Defence minister, announced a pioneering agreement to boost logistical support for military aircraft engines. He disclosed that a "partnering agreement" had been signed between the Defence Aviation Repair Agency and the engine makers Rolls-Royce.
The aim was to provide "best practice integrated logistics support for military engines in service with the armed forces".
Opposition defence spokesman Quentin Davies welcomed improvement in the logistics organisation and the Rolls-Royce arrangement. Mr Davies said the Tories were "totally committed" to the Eurofighter programme and the A400M.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments