Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

House of Lords: The coming debate

Colin Brown
Friday 13 May 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MPs and peers are to be given a free vote on Lords reform, including the removal of the remaining 92 hereditary peers

MPs and peers are to be given a free vote on Lords reform, including the removal of the remaining 92 hereditary peers

Tony Blair wants a largely appointed chamber but was reluctantly forced by his Cabinet to take the matter to a free vote .

Repeated attempts to reform the Lords since Labour came to power, including a Royal Commission chaired by Lord Wakeham, have foundered over a failure to reach a consensus on the proportion of the Lords that should be elected.

The Tories now support a 'substantially' elected upper chamber,. The Liberal Democrats' spokesman, Mark Oaten, backed a 70 per cent elected Lords.

A cross-party group, including Labour's Robin Cook and Tony Wright, Tory, Ken Clarke and Liberal Democrat, Paul Tyler, also pushed the 70 per cent threshhold.

The Government proposes the Lords' powers to delay legislation for 12 months should be reduced to 60 days after the rows over the hunting ban.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in