House of Lords Speaker says number of peers needs to be reduced to get rid of 'passengers'
Lord Fowler says it is 'unfair' that some peers do not fulfil responsibilities
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The number of peers should be reduced to remove "passengers" who do not contribute to debates, the House of Lords Speaker has said.
Norman Fowler said there were some members of the Lords who were given life peerages without understanding the requirements of the job.
The former Tory cabinet minister is at the centre of efforts to reduce the size of the Lords from around 800 to a maximum of 600.
This involves encouraging some peers to retire and restricting the number of people being granted peerages.
It comes after a surge in the number of life peers under the governments of Tony Blair and David Cameron.
Mr Blair appointed 374 people to the upper House, while Mr Cameron ennobled 260.
Lord Fowler, a cabinet minister under Margaret Thatcher, said a small minority of peers had accepted their appointment without understanding the responsibilities of the role.
He said: “You do have extraordinary cases where people have come in and after a few days they’ve come to the conclusion that, actually they’re in the wrong place doing the wrong thing – or rather not doing the wrong thing - and the last thing we want in the House of Lords is passengers.”
“It’s partly unfair, because there were some good people who came in. What I think is fair to say is that on that, as with other appointments, there was no process in which they came before a commission and it was explained to a prospective new peer what was involved in the job.”
He added: "I do think it is completely crazy that we have a system at the moment where the size of the House of Lords is totally open-ended.
“I know of no assembly in the western world, or any other world for that matter, where there isn’t a limit on the numbers. It isn’t a revolutionary thing to say.”
Lord Fowler, a prominent LGBT rights campaigner, also revealed that one peer had told him they believed AIDS was "self-inflicted".
Commenting on the campaign to improve attitudes towards HIV, he said: “When I have finished with this job, it is one of the things that I intend to return to, for the years that are left, to campaign on that.
“I had the other day a peer who came up to me after a series of question before World Aids Day, and said, ‘You know, in my view it’s just all self-inflicted’. And you think, ‘Really?’”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments