Heseltine to set out vision for industry: Select committee to hear case for intervention
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MICHAEL HESELTINE is planning to use a hearing of the Select Committee on Trade and Industry today to set out his vision for industrial intervention by the Government.
The President of the Board of Trade finalised the text of a statement to the committee at a meeting with colleagues at the Department of Trade and Industry. It will update the industrial strategy he set out in his book, Where There's a Will, in 1987.
Mr Heseltine's statement was intended to be a reply to his critics, who have poured scorn on his Conservative conference pledge last year to intervene 'before breakfast, before lunch, before tea, and before dinner . . .'
But it will be truncated. Before the hearing, he asked the permission of the Labour chairman, Dick Caborn, to submit a statement on his thoughts about the DTI's role. Mr Caborn, a no- nonsense Yorkshireman, replied: 'Yes, but keep it short.'
Mr Caborn, who campaigned for a rescue of the pits that Mr Heseltine announced would be closed, is not convinced of the Secretary of State's commitment to intervention.
In his book, published after he had walked out of the Thatcher Cabinet, Mr Heseltine said it was 'indefensible' that the Government had no single minister responsible for its relations with industry. He also pointed at the need for pension funds to invest in British industry - a policy recently embraced by the Labour spokesman, Robin Cook.
In spite of the damage Mr Heseltine sustained over the pit closure debacle, his friends say he has 'dusted himself down, and bounced back'. He is in for a gruelling cross-examination and will make it clear his strategy does not mean a return to the 1970s Labour policy of rescuing 'lame ducks' or picking winners.
He is hoping the rescue of Leyland DAF in a management buyout will vindicate his refusal to bow to demands for a Government lifeline.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments