Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Migration Watch report criticised for 'risking British livelihoods'

Exiting single market 'would leave Britain economically isolated and poorer' says Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron

Harriet Agerholm
Wednesday 28 December 2016 20:54 EST
Comments
Migration Watch UK has warned that ministers need to clarify their post-Brexit immigration aims
Migration Watch UK has warned that ministers need to clarify their post-Brexit immigration aims (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A right-wing think tank that campaigns for tougher immigration controls has been accused of risking the livelihoods of thousands of British people.

In a recent report, the influential Migration Watch UK recommended a hard Brexit, claiming that immigration from the EU would “remain high” if Britain stayed in the single market.

“It is not possible to be both a member of the European single market and in control of EU immigration,” it said.

“If the UK remains a member of the single market, EU migration will remain high and is unlikely to fall below 155,000 a year in the medium term.”

But the leader of the Liberal Democrats, Tim Farron, said it was "no surprise that Ukip's favourite think-tank is pushing for a hard Brexit that would rip Britain out of the single market, costing jobs and risking the livelihoods of thousands of British people."

Criticising the findings, he said the majority of people in the UK wish to stay in the single market.

"They do not want a hard Brexit that would leave Britain economically isolated and poorer," he said.

Migration Watch's paper said the scope for a "significant reduction" in the number was "extremely limited" if Britain remained a member of the single market, and thus subject to free movement of people.

The most recent official figures showed that total international net migration – the difference between the number of people arriving and leaving the country – was at a near record estimated level of 335,000 in the year to the end of June.

This is considerably more than the Government's target of less than 100,000. Net migration for EU citizens was estimated to be 189,000, the highest number recorded.

Ukip's immigration spokesman John Bickley claimed that the report showed a "population explosion" would occur in the coming years if immigration was not strictly clamped down on.

“Today's report from Migration Watch makes it crystal clear that remaining in the EU's single market will mean the continuation of uncontrolled immigration," he said. “Throughout the EU referendum campaign both sides made it utterly apparent that voting to leave the European Union meant leaving the single market.

“These new forecasts show that failing to control immigration will result in a population explosion of 12 million in 25 years, equivalent to the entire current populations of Bulgaria and New Zealand.”

In response to the report a Government spokesperson said: "The people spoke very clearly in the referendum to say they wanted Britain to control its own borders and to see lower levels of immigration.

"That is what we will deliver as we strike the best possible deal for leaving the EU: one that is unique to Britain, not an 'off-the-shelf' solution.

"We have been clear that this must mean the UK controlling its borders and reducing immigration – but also British companies having the maximum freedom to trade with and operate in the single market."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in