Hague warns against rewriting expenses reforms
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.William Hague today warned the new parliamentary watchdog not to try to re-write plans to clean-up the system of MPs expenses.
The shadow foreign secretary became the most senior politician to speak out after Professor Sir Ian Kennedy let it be known that he was thinking of dropping key elements of the blueprint for reform.
The plan, published last week, was drawn up by Sir Christopher Kelly, the chairman of the Committee for Standards in Public Life, after an extensive consultation.
However Sir Ian, the £100,000-a-year, three-day-a-week head of the new Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), has made clear he has no obligation to accept Sir Christopher's recommendations and is planning to run his own consultation.
In particular he was said to be preparing to drop plans to require MPs to hand back any profits they make on the sale of homes bought with mortgages subsidised by the taxpayer and the ban on MPs employing family members.
However, Mr Hague warned that it would to nothing to restore public confidence if Sir Ian tried to reopen the matter now.
"I think it would be wrong to re-write what has now been produced," he told BBC1's The Andrew Marr Show.
"The public are pleased with what Sir Christopher Kelly has said and we have to accept it, not quibble about it, and we don't really want somebody else to come in and quibble about it either.
"That would be unwise and unnecessary."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments