Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Guidelines on schools urged

Ngaio Crequer
Wednesday 23 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PARENTS' support for failing schools would be more valuable if they knew what schools should offer their children as a good education, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector said yesterday, writes Ngaio Crequer.

Professor Stewart Sutherland, head of the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted), said local authorities should do more to inform parents about the kind of education they should expect. This would enable parents to respond to criticism with more than simple emotion.

'Without such advice, parents will be shocked by the news that their school is failing. They will jump to defend their school, not least because acceptance that their child attends a school providing a poor education is a reflection on them as well as on the school.'

It was natural and commendable that parents should rally round their local school when it appeared to be under fire, he said. 'But their support would be more valuable if it was based on a clear-eyed view of the school's performance rather than on emotion.'

He told the Cambridge Educational Associates' conference on under-performing schools that inspectors had more than just a monitoring or reporting function. They also aimed to bring about improvement in schools.

'Inspection by itself can never be a sufficient condition for improvement but it is a necessary condition. It has a key role where it is done well and the most is made of it.'

He said that in recent years schools identified by inspectors as showing cause for concern had made substantive improvements, and taken themselves off the danger list.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in