Guidelines on mentally ill 'failing'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MOVES promised by Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health, to safeguard the public against the dangerous mentally ill are failing, with some trusts and health authorities refusing to set up registers of people who may turn violent, writes Rosie Waterhouse.
Government guidance to hospitals to compile registers of mentally ill patients who are a danger to themselves or others is 'unlawful' and could breach British and European law, according to legal advice given to Mind, the mental health charity.
Judi Clements, Mind's national director, said the registers would be an offence against basic civil rights and 'a smokescreen to cover the appalling failures in the community care system. Now we have leading counsel's opinion that they are not a legal directive and could breach the law. It is clear the money would be much better spent building national minimum standards of community care'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments