Government loses appeal over NHS reforms dossier
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government has lost the latest stage of its fight to prevent publication of an internal Civil Service assessment of risks posed by the NHS reforms.
An appeal by the Department of Health against an order by the Information Commissioner to publish the "transition risk register" was thrown out by a tribunal yesterday. Officials argued that disclosing the dossier would inhibit civil servants from speaking their minds to ministers in the future.
The Information Rights Tribunal upheld the commissioner's ruling that the November 2010 document should be disclosed. The original call for the register to be published was made by the former shadow Health Secretary John Healey. In response to the tribunal's decision, he said: "The judgment backs the public's right to know about the risks the Government is taking with its NHS plans."
The Department of Health will await the tribunal's full decision before deciding whether to appeal, but Mr Healey urged ministers to publish the document.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments