Government faces parliamentary backlash over plans to devolve powers to city regions
'Without financial autonomy, political autonomy is a bit of a myth'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The government faces a parliamentary backlash over its plans to devolve housing, transport and policing powers to city regions and for failing to give mayors the right to raise money.
Many devolution enthusiasts are adamant the system cannot work unless the proposed new elected mayors are allowed to borrow from the markets to fund their plans. Instead, they will have to go to the Treasury. The Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill is scheduled for debate in the House of Lords on 8 June.
Clive Betts, who chaired the Communities and Local Government committee in the last parliament, told The Independent on Sunday that he planned to table an amendment to the bill. This would delete a line that states the “power conferred on a mayor may not include a power to borrow money”.
Mr Betts said: “I want to take this clause out so that city regions [that bid for devolution powers] have the discretion to borrow for infrastructure and other projects.
“Giving mayors more [financial] resources means they will have more choice over how it’s spent – in this form, it’s completely with the Treasury on how much is spent. It’s a very strange thing to specify.”
Although Mr Betts is a Labour MP, he can expect some support from Conservative backbenchers who believe that mayors would need greater clout than the current proposals suggest. One said: “Without financial autonomy, political autonomy is a bit of a myth – other countries have 40, 50, 60 per cent of revenue raised at the local level.”
Labour leadership contender Mary Creagh said that she would also back the amendment. The Government is keen for more decision-making to be made at regional level, as it believes local politicians and officials have a better understanding of what projects and resources are needed to boost economic growth.
The spur for devolution is partly in response to the swathe of powers that are going to be handed to Scotland, which were promised by the main party leaders in last year’s independence referendum in order to secure a “No” vote.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments