Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gordon Brown 'misled inquiry' on defence spending

Michael Savage,Political Correspondent
Wednesday 17 March 2010 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gordon Brown has been forced into a damaging retreat after he finally admitted he misled the Iraq Inquiry and Parliament about the funds handed to the armed forces.

Senior military figures complained bitterly after the Prime Minster told Sir John Chilcot's inquiry that the budget for British troops had risen above the rate of inflation every year for the last decade. Mr Brown later repeated the claim in the Commons.

But, in a rare and surprising admission during Prime Minister's Questions yesterday, Mr Brown conceded that the claim was not accurate and that he would be writing to the inquiry to correct the statement. "I do accept that, in one or two years, defence expenditure did not rise in real terms," he said.

Mr Brown blamed "operational fluctuations" for the individual falls in real-terms spending.

A research note prepared by the House of Commons Library in October last year showed defence expenditure had fallen in real terms in four financial years since Labour came to power in 1997: 1997-98 (-2.2 per cent); 1999-2000 (-0.4 per cent); 2004-05 (-0.7 per cent); and 2006-07 (-0.1 per cent). The average annual increase between 1997 and 2009 was 2.7 per cent, it said, but noted that "this figure is likely to have been distorted by current operations".

The admission will increase pressure on the Chilcot inquiry to recall Mr Brown to give more evidence in the summer. A spokesman for the Prime Minister blamed the mistake on the complexity of the budget, adding that Mr Brown had corrected himself at the first opportunity. He refused to say when Mr Brown learnt of the error. "I don't think the Prime Minister has ever had anything to hide on this," he said. "He has done it at the time that he thinks it's appropriate."

Mr Brown had fiercely defended the claim at last week's PMQs. "I said to the inquiry very clearly first of all that the expenditure of the Ministry of Defence has been rising in real terms," he told David Cameron. "The defence budget... is rising every year."

Liam Fox, the shadow Defence Secretary, said Mr Brown's admission represented "a humiliating climbdown" from a week ago. "His attempt to rewrite history has failed and his fantasy figures have been exposed," he said.

The Prime Minister's evidence sparked condemnation from some senior military figures who said it was "disingenuous" of him to say that he provided military chiefs with everything they asked for.

General Sir Mike Jackson, the former chief of the general staff, said yesterday that he was annoyed by Mr Brown's repeated claims of a real-terms rise, "but it is for him to explain". While there had been a "modest" overall rise in spending since 1997, defence had not been given "the right resources to do what it is being asked to do operationally", he told BBC Radio 4's PM.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in