Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gay clause defenders say repeal inevitable

Ian Shoesmith
Monday 20 March 2000 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Scottish pressure group opposed to the scrapping of the law banning the promotion of homosexuality in schools yesterday accepted defeat in its battle to retain Section 28.

Members of Keep the Clause, whose high profile campaign was bankrolled by Brian Souter, chairman of transport group Stagecoach, told the Scottish Parliament's Equal Opportunities Committee that they knew repeal was almost certain to go ahead.

But they stressed that pro-Section 28 campaigners were not homophobic and wanted youngsters to be taught about the benefits of stable, heterosexual relationships most usually found in marriages.

Patrick Rowlink, 36, a salesman and school board member from Airdrie, said it was reasonable for people to support Section 28's retention, or equivalent legally binding guidelines, while at the same time being opposed to homophobia.

The Scottish Executive is committed to repealing Section 2a, better known as Section 28, of the Local Government Act.

Groups backing repeal told the committee that Section 28 was discriminatory, and that the dispute over repeal had led to a surge in calls to gay helplines.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in