Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Future of Wakeham on press watchdog in balance

David Lister,Culture Editor
Monday 04 February 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The body that funds and oversees the Press Complaints Commission will meet today amid calls for reform of the regulatory body.

The meeting of Pressbof (Press Standards Board of Finance Ltd) will consider the decision by Lord Wakeham to step down temporarily from the PCC chairmanship because of his involvement in the Enron investigations.

Professor Robert Pinker, a respected academic, has been appointed acting chairman. But it is believed that the newspaper managing directors and other senior executives who constitute Pressbof could decide that it is unrealistic for Lord Wakeham's long absence to be temporary. The search may begin for a new chairman.

A number of broadsheet editors have expressed concern at the present state of the PCC and have warned against it being too close to tabloid editors and to the Royal Family.

The Institute of Public Policy Research said yesterday that "the need for reform of self-regulation of the press is undeniable. In the 10 years since it was set up, the PCC has achieved a great deal, but continues to be criticised for an over-close relationship with editors, and for a lack of any clear sanctions."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in