Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Former GCHQ chief says SNP's anti-nuclear stance would cast 'dark shadow' over a newly independent Scotland

 

Lewis Smith
Thursday 13 March 2014 17:41 EDT
Comments
The SNP's demand that all nuclear weapons be removed would create "huge practical problems"
The SNP's demand that all nuclear weapons be removed would create "huge practical problems" (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Former GCHQ boss Sir David Omand has warned that the SNP's defence and security plans would cast “a dark shadow” over a newly independent Scotland.

He said that the SNP's anti-nuclear stance would be likely to upset the United States if an independent Scotland wanted to be part of Nato.

The SNP's demand that all nuclear weapons be removed by the end of the first parliament following independence would also create “huge practical problems”. He added: “I find it hard not to conclude that would cast a very dark shadow over all the negotiations on intelligence and security.”

He made his comments in an interview with the Daily Telegraph in which he warned: “For any newly independent country security is going to be one of the first and most important duties. You can't be 'a little bit independent' when it comes to security.

“A newly independent Scotland, were there to be a yes vote, is going to have to take some pretty urgent measures to ensure that it is in a position to look after its own people.”

Sir David, who after leaving GCHQ became permanent secretary at the Home Office and spent seven years on the Joint Intelligence Committee, said that if it votes for independence Scotland will need time, money and good will to build its security network. He said they are all likely to be in short supply.

Time in particular will, he said, be at a premium because a country cannot afford to leave gaps in its security and intelligence.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in