Philanthropists including Bill and Melinda Gates pledge £100m to cover part of UK foreign aid cut

The government is under increasing pressure to reverse its multibillion-pound cut to foreign aid, as a group of charities and philanthropists pledge to help plug the gap with emergency funds.

Criticism of the government’s cut, which equates to a shortfall of £4 billion a year, came from Labour and the Archbishop of Canterbury.

It comes after a report revealed that the consortium of charities, which includes the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, will pledge more than £100 million to a one-year plan to partially replace the cuts.

The donation by charities – including the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, the ELMA Foundation and Open Society Foundations – will target projects working on preventable diseases and family planning, according to The Sunday Times.

The UN’s family planning agency (UNFPA) is set to lose about 85 per cent of its funding from the UK, a cut of approximately £130m.

Prime minister Boris Johnson’s government had announced a reduction in foreign aid from 0.7 per cent of national income – which is enshrined in law – to 0.5 per cent in November last year.

The government said the financial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic had forced ministers to take “tough but necessary decisions”.

A group of about 50 Tory MPs, including Mr Johnson’s predecessor Theresa May, are demanding a parliamentary vote on the government’s decision to slash the foreign aid budget.

The emergency funding from the charities was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, who said it was “desperately needed”, but he called on the government to restore its commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of national income on foreign aid.

Labour’s shadow international development secretary Preet Kaur Gill said the philanthropists’ decision to step in has embarrassed the UK.

“This is a shameful moment for this Conservative government,” Ms Gill said in a statement.

“As low-income countries continue to battle against the pandemic, this contribution to try and plug some of the gap left by the government’s slashing of life-saving paid programmes is welcome, but it will only be able to prevent the very worst of the damage caused.

“The government’s decision to cut the aid budget, against the wishes of parliament, has already cost lives and they must reverse it or put to a vote as soon as possible.”

A government spokesperson has said that the UK will “return to spending 0.7 per cent of gross national income on international development as soon as the fiscal situation allows.”