Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gender pay gap: Firms who pay men more than women to be 'named and shamed'

Move is part of the PM's drive to 'end the gender pay gap in a generation'

Nigel Morris
Tuesday 14 July 2015 05:46 EDT
Comments
In a drive to 'end the gender pay gap in a generation', businesses with more than 250 staff will have to disclose the difference between the salaries of male and female employees
In a drive to 'end the gender pay gap in a generation', businesses with more than 250 staff will have to disclose the difference between the salaries of male and female employees (Rex )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Large companies guilty of paying men more than women are to be “named and shamed” under moves set out by David Cameron.

In a drive to “end the gender pay gap in a generation”, businesses with more than 250 staff will have to disclose the difference between the salaries of male and female employees.

The initiative was championed by the Liberal Democrats in the Coalition but was initially resisted by the Tories on the basis it would load firms with red tape.

But Mr Cameron will announce publication of average wage rates is to begin next year following consultation with major business leaders over the detail of the plan.

Writing in the Times, he said the government was making a “really big move” by forcing companies to reveal the pay gap between the sexes. He said: ”That will cast sunlight on the discrepancies and create the pressure we need for change, driving women’s wages up.”

The Confederation of British Industry struck a cautionary note. Katja Hall, its deputy director-general, said: “Addressing the gender pay gap is the right priority – and we should set a target for reducing it.

“While we believe publishing pay gap data could be misleading, we will work with the Government to ensure rules on what is published are flexible enough to be relevant to each company.”

A consultation will also be launched into what more can be done to encourage girls to consider the widest range of career choices.

The moves coincide with the announcement that women directors now occupy 25 per cent of the places on FTSE 100 company boards.

They were set the target of one-quarter representation by 2015 by Lord Davies of Abersoch, who led a government-commissioned review on boosting the number of female company directors.

The Coalition faced repeated charges that austerity measures hit women harder than men – particularly as large numbers work in the public sector, much of which suffered a spending squeeze.

George Osborne, the Chancellor, said on Monday that two-thirds of the workers who will benefit from the Government's new national living wage, which was announced in last week’s Budget, are female.

But a House of Commons analysis, commissioned by the Labour leadership hopeful Yvette Cooper, found the Budget benefits cuts hit women harder than men. It calculated that 70 per cent of welfare savings by 2020/21 will come from women.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in