Farmers cheer Tory supermarkets ombudsman
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Supermarkets would be forced to fund a body which would have the power to name and shame and even fine retailers who engage in unfair dealings with suppliers, the Conservatives said today.
An ombudsman, which would help settle disagreements between supermarkets and farmers, was put forward by Tory frontbencher Nick Herbert. Speaking at the Oxford Farming Conference, he said the body would “curb abuses of power which undermine our farmers”.
Aides confirmed the body would be part of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and would be an “ombudsman with teeth”, able to force supermarkets to abide by the new Grocery Suppliers’ Code of Practice – to be introduced next month. Retailers who refused to comply could be subject to fines. It would publish annual reports and could have the power to name individual cases to the public.
An aide said: “This would not be another quango, it would be paid for, not by the taxpayer but by the supermarkets.The OFT is an independent body, which should stop undue influence on the retailers’ part.”
The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) welcomed the move as “very good news”. The union’s head of government affairs, Terry Jones, said: “The idea is to get a fair deal for everyone and, if that means a better price for farmers, then that is money that that can be reinvested in better farming techniques, benefiting consumers.”
He added that, at the moment, supermarkets can force suppliers to bear the brunt of poor sales by imposing retrospective discounts or charges on farmers.
One Chichester farmer, who did not want to be named, said: “At times farmers are put under extreme pressure by the buyers, supermarkets and suppliers. Farmers are afraid of being cut out of the loop if they make a fuss – which is why we need an ombudsman.”
Mr Jones added that the farmers would be guaranteed anonymity if they complained to the ombudsman.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments