'Family friendly' hours on the way
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Peers paved the way yesterday for more family-friendly working hours in the Lords, despite Tory complaints that it would undermine the scrutiny of government.
In a debate on working practices, peers proposed reforms including timetabling of legislation, daytime-only sittings and electronic voting.
Baroness Jay of Paddington, Leader of the Lords, said: "Members of this House are typically juggling three competing priorities - their work here, their work outside and their family responsibilities ... Can anyone feel they are performing adequately in their other roles if they have been in this House, as they were this morning until 2am, fulfilling their duties as legislators? One alternative would be for the House to work a more nine-to-five pattern."
Lord Strathclyde, the Tory leader in the Lords, said he had "no wish to see an attempt to mug this House under the misnomer of modernisation. We should not make changes in our procedures for our own personal convenience, still less that of ministers but only such changes as enable our House to operate more effectively in scrutinising not just this government, but all governments."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments