Eurotunnel extension under fire
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EUROTUNNEL was granted a 10-year extension to its 55-year Channel tunnel operating concession without a detailed examination of the cost to the taxpayer, a Labour MP claimed yesterday, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
John MacGregor, Secretary of State for Transport, has so far failed to identify the likely value of revenue foregone. In return for the extension to 2052, agreed in December, Eurotunnel agreed to drop up to pounds 1bn worth of legal claims against the British and French governments for extra costs arising from safety, security and environmental measures.
The move allowed the company to reach a settlement with its bankers for extra funding to cover start-up costs. The tunnel's cost rose from pounds 6bn in 1987 to about pounds 10bn, partly because of additional measures demanded by both governments.
In reply to a parliamentary question from John Spellar, Labour MP for Warley West, Mr MacGregor said: 'It is not possible to say with any precision what the cost to the Government of the extension of the concession will be.'
Mr Spellar said: 'It is quite extraordinary for the Government to give away 10 years' future revenue while being unable, apparently, to put a figure on it. It is yet another example of government mismanagement - unless the fact is that it is afraid to reveal what it has handed over.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments