Bid to create AI Authority amid pleas for swifter action from UK Government
Peers will consider the Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill on Friday March 22.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain risks “sliding into global irrelevance” on artificial intelligence (AI) if the Government does not introduce new laws to regulate the sector, according to a Conservative peer.
A new body, known as the AI Authority, would be established under a proposal tabled in Parliament by Lord Holmes of Richmond.
His Artificial Intelligence (Regulation) Bill, to be debated at second reading on Friday, would require the authority to push forward AI regulation in the UK and assess and monitor potential risks to the economy.
We need leadership, right-sized regulation, right now
Security, fairness, accountability and transparency are among the principles that the AI Authority must take into consideration, according to the Bill.
The Government believes a non-statutory approach provides “critical adaptability” but has pledged to keep it under review.
Lord Holmes said: “The current Government approach risks the UK sliding into global irrelevance on this hugely important issue of protecting citizen rights and ensuring AI is developed and deployed in a humanity-enhancing, rather than a society-destroying, way.
“The Government claims that their light-touch approach is ‘pro-innovation’ but innovation is not aided by uncertainty and instability.
“AI offers some of the greatest opportunities for our economy, our society, our human selves.
“It also, if unregulated holds obvious existential harms. Self-governance and voluntary agreements just don’t cut it.
“We need leadership, right-sized regulation, right now.
“The UK can, the UK must lead when it comes to ethical AI.
“This Bill offers them that very opportunity. I hope they take it.”
The Bill would also seek to ensure any person involved in training AI would have to supply to the authority a record of all third-party data and intellectual property (IP) they used and offer assurances that informed consent was secured for its use.
Lord Holmes added on the labelling system: “People would know if a service or a good had used or deployed AI in the provision of that service.”
Speaking in November last year, Rishi Sunak said Britain’s AI safety summit would “tip the balance in favour of humanity” after reaching an agreement with technology firms to vet their models before their release.
The Prime Minister said “binding requirements” would likely to be needed to regulate the technology, but now is the time to move quickly without laws.
Elon Musk, the owner of social media platform X, described AI as “one of the biggest threats” facing humanity.
The Government announced in February that more than £100 million will be spent preparing the UK to regulate AI and use the technology safely, including helping to prepare and upskill regulators across different sectors.
Minister have chosen to use existing regulators to take on the role of monitoring AI use within their own sectors rather than creating a new, central regulator dedicated to the emerging technology.
A Government spokesman said: “As is standard process, the Government’s position on this Bill will be confirmed during the debate.”