Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Election '97: One Nation values stage timely comeback

Fran Abrams Political Correspondent
Wednesday 02 April 1997 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FThe return of John Major's Conservative Party to the One Nation fold is signalled in yesterday's manifesto. In 1992, the Prime Minister chose to adopt the Thatcherite creed of slim government, low taxes and personal prosperity. In 1997, he has taken a more mellow tone.

Yesterday's offering uses the language of social responsibility and community values. While a commitment to the market economy runs strongly through it, the reader's mind is thrown back to an earlier brand of Conservatism.

An emphasis on security and stability in the economy and in support for families is linked to the suggestion that this in "in the best Conservative tradition". In his foreword to The Best Future for Britain, the 1992 manifesto, Mr Major writes: "Our aim is to spread opportunity for all to succeed, whoever they are and wherever they come from, provided they are prepared to work hard. To turn the 'have nots' into the 'haves.' To support the family in providing security and stability."

At yesterday's press launch, he went further, saying that "in the tradition of One Nation Conservatism", his party would bring wealth and welfare, hand in hand.

In 1992, the Conservative manifesto included a section on "the route to lower taxes," which underlined the need for "hard work, ingenuity, thrift and willingness to take risks." Although this year's also emphasises the need for lower taxes, it adds that Conservatives would "continue to spend more on the services which matter most to people - hospitals, schools and the police".

The family did not merit a chapter heading in 1992, but in 1997 it gets four-and-a-half pages. Pledges, including a desire for tax cuts, share ownership, higher thresholds for inheritance tax and stricter regulation of social services, are all placed in the context of helping families.

"The family is the most important institution in our lives. It offers security and stability in a fast-changing world," the manifesto says.

While the 1992 manifesto's first chapter created a vision of Britain as a major player on the world stage, the 1997 manifesto emphasises living standards instead.

In 1992, our role in the European Community was writ large on page three. This year it is relegated to page 45.

In 1992, the manifesto boasted that the Conservatives had "ensured that Britain is at the heart of Europe; a strong and respected partner."

In 1997 the tone has changed. Although Britain has much to gain from its membership of the European Union, the nation state must be preserved.

In 1992, the nightmare vision of a Labour Britain portrayed in the Conservative manifesto was one of strife and of strikes. In 1997, the alternative sounds less frightening. "Stakeholding" would load costs on business and "devolution" would mean breaking up the country.

Even for Mr Major, it seems, the demons of 1970s' Socialism seem to have have receded slightly.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in