Edinburgh tram scheme had ‘litany of avoidable failures’ says nine-year inquiry
Scotland’s current transport minister dismisses findings as says inquiry was ‘too long and too costly’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.City authorities and Scottish government ministers were chiefly to blame for a “litany of avoidable failures,” according to an official inquiry into the delayed and over-budget Edinburgh tram project.
“Poor management and abdication of responsibility on a large scale have had a significant and lasting impact on the lives and livelihoods of Edinburgh residents, and the reputation of the city,” concluded Lord Hardie, the retired judge who chaired the nine-year inquiry.
But his findings were immediately dismissed by Scotland’s current transport minister, Mairi McAllan, who said the inquiry itself had been “too long and too costly” and claimed some of its conclusions were not supported by evidence.
City of Edinburgh Council apologised, saying “serious mistakes were made” during the scheme, which cost more than double the original estimate and opened in 2014 with a curtailed route and another planned line axed altogether.
Contractors and the city’s transport quango became embroiled in a bitter and lengthy blame game as the project became mired in delays, while the landmark Princes Street suffered two major and lengthy closures: first to dig up the road and lay the route, then again to fix defective concrete.
Lord Hardie’s 959-page report said the project had cost even more than previously feared, at £835.7m. Its recommendations include legislation to enable sanctions against individuals or companies “who knowingly submit reports that include false statements” on the progress or cost of major projects.
“There was a litany of avoidable failures on the parts of several parties whose role it was to ensure that public funding was spent effectively and to the benefit of Scotland’s taxpayers, and that the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered efficiently,” Lord Hardie said.
There was a political dimension to early stages of the project; the SNP, which had wanted to prioritise improvements to the A9 trunk road, had become reluctant supporters of the project, commissioned under a Labour adminstration.
The original business cases for the scheme were also “misleading” and did not represent the risk allowance, Lord Hardie said, while the decision of SNP minister John Swinney, who became Scotland’s finance secretary in May 2007, to scale back the involvement of Transport Scotland, was a mistake.
Scottish Conservative MSP Miles Briggs said the report showed “that ministers failed to protect the public purse and acted in the SNP’s political interests, rather than the public interest.”
Cammy Day, the current leader of City of Edinburgh Council, said: "There’s no getting away from the fact that the original project caused a great deal of disruption to residents and businesses, as well as damaging the city’s reputation, and on behalf of the council I want to apologise for this. I won’t, however, apologise for building a tram system or for our ambition to develop it further.”
The first part of the tram line had “flourished” in the nine years since it had opened, he said, and the recent extension to Newhaven is “extremely popular.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments